Fukushima: It is getting worse

There was a script we were supposed to be following in Japan after 3/11/11.  It went something like this.

There would be a parliamentary study of what went wrong and Fukushima.  The nuclear regulator which was very cozy with the nuclear utility would be blamed, it would be disassembled and new “tougher” regulator would take it’s place.  The government at the time would be blamed for it’s poor handling of the disaster, and it would lose control of the nation in the upcoming elections.  The utility responsible for the accident TEPCO would lose so much money it would be nationalized.  All the reactors in the country would be closed (because local government are involved in these decisions in ways they are not permitted to be in the US).  There would be huge demonstrations against nuclear power by the normally complacent Japanese people.

nuclear japan map icons

Then good things (from the industry perspective) would start happening.    Two of the safest  reactors would be re-opened to show Japan was not anti-nuclear and to prove that the country could not run without at least some of them being online (47 others remained idle).  Fearing China militarily and a weak economy, the Japanese would elect a pro-nuclear government.  Less than one year after the Fukushima triple meltdowns the utility would announce that  they had attained the status of “Cold Shutdown” and that clean up efforts were moving forward apace.  It would often be reported that No one died at Fukushima” There would be expert reports on blackouts if Japan did not return to nuclear power.  More reactors would be approved for restart under new stricter rules.  Some small number of renewable projects would be built.  Japan would continue to export reactor technology. Tokyo would win the hosting privileges for the 2020 Olympics and everything would be back to normal.

But this script has gotten a bit derailed.  It turns out that not only is Fukushima not under control and getting cleaned up.  It is getting worse.  One problem is water.  The quantities of radioactive water which the utility is trying to store are huge – over 200K tons is currently in onsite tanks and the quantity is growing.    Increasingly these tanks are leaking.  But dont be fooled by the idea of tanks holding this poisoned water.  It has always been TEPCOs plan to dump radioactive contaminants in the ocean.  It has done this repeatedly since the meltdowns and has been lobbying for permission to continue.  While TEPCO currently permits about 600 tons of radioactive water per day to go into the oceanFishing in the area has been suspended indefinitely.

tanks are already leaking after less than a years operation

tanks are already leaking after less than a years operation

The new tougher nuclear regulator has requested the government take over from TEPCOs failed effort to address the accident, which is likely a good thing, because TEPCO is looking at the problem from a “how do we spend as little as possible on this” perspective.

But the Abe governments real problem is that reality is not following the script.  The mainstream media is picking up that the situation is getting worse (and the government efforts will likely have little more efficacy than the utilities).  Not only is the situation not well contained, if sea water is not endlessly pumped into the areas where the reactor fuel has burned thru the bottom of the plants we are looking at another series of explosions and releases at Fukushima.  There are still about 100K people who are displaced because of the meltdowns alone.  And the efforts to dismiss health effects are being countered.  And while Japanese PM Abe is heading off to try to secure Tokyo’s Olympic bid, back home critics are demanding he declare a state of emergency.

Declared or not, there is a worsening emergency at Fukushima and it is knocking some of the worlds best paid PR people off their clever script.

Tags: , , , , , ,

About paxus

a funologist, memeticist and revolutionary. Can be found in the vanity bin of Wikipedia and in locations of imminent calamity. buckle up, there is going to be some rough sledding.

8 responses to “Fukushima: It is getting worse”

  1. santalorena says :

    This is so frightening. Pacific seafood is already unsafe to eat (mercury and, increasingly, radiation), and now Alaskan fish is off the list of “safe to consume.” From this computer projection (link to video below), it’s just a matter of time before TEPCO radiation makes its way through the Bering Strait into the soon-to-be unsafe northern waters of the Arctic.

    On a completely different note, I respectfully implore you to stop using the world “loose” [not fitting tightly; released; slutty] when you mean “lose” [unable to find; ceased to possess]. It’s just one of those things that makes me go a little apoplectic when I see those misused.

    BTW, the http://catastrophemap.org/wordpress/?p=1331 link is not working. For me, at least.

    Finally, I’m grateful for your lifelong dedication to ending the scourge of nuclear power. Thank you.

  2. Steve Dooner says :

    It’s “lose” not “loose.”

  3. Jan Haverkamp says :

    Good piece, Pax. By the way – I happen to know from a good source that the planning was not about a few reports on black-outs, but about a few real black-outs to scare people back to nukes. There was (and probably still is) so much chaos in meeting this catastrophe, that they could not get that done after the first year… and I presume that later it became more difficult to sell…

    • paxus says :

      Having gone now over a year with no reactors (or only 2 of 50) operating and having canceled the highly effective energy conservation program, it is hard to claim suddenly nukes are needed in Japan. The latest lie, that there are natural gas shortages, wont really work either. And as much as the Abe government does not want to admit it, it is clear Japan can run without reactors. In the short term with more natural gas, in the long term with real renewables replacing them – and hopeful cuts in the wasteful Japanese energy consumption, which turns out is even worse than my wasteful country.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Japan is Nuclear Free, again | your passport to complaining - September 18, 2013

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: