Tag Archive | ecological footprint

The Dark Side of Burning Man

[This article is the second part of a two part series, the first of which is on why Burning Man is Funologically Significant – the upside of the event.]

Burning Man is completely unsustainable.  Even the significant efforts of the Alternative Energy Zone sustainable energy theme camp do very little to mitigate the huge ecological footprint of the camp.  Does this event use more power than a nuclear aircraft carrier (which supports 1/10 the population) ? No, it certainly uses less, but we are an even longer way away from the discussion about a sustainable military.  If sustainability is your personal primary objective, you can bail on this post and this festival here.

The place is dirty with cops.  My last visit to BM in 2009 was ruined by the police busting in and busting people in our camp.  Almost all these charges were dropped in the end, after tremendous hassle.  One of the design constraints of the Transformus regional Burning Man event is that it has to be fewer than 2000 people; that way they can have their own security rather than the police from outside.  The 70,000 plus person event* in the Nevada desert does not have this luxury and correspondingly there are police of all different stripes at the event, busily spying, entrapping and otherwise ruining this event which is not running over anyone else’s rights.  There is this scary acceptance at BM that the police are there and nothing can be done about them.  To me, in this regard Burning Man has given up its political power and said “We need to integrate the police state into our party.”  There are dozens of things either organizers or participants could do to reduce the police presence at the event, and these things are not being done.  The Wikipedia entry on BM gives a very low number of arrests and lists citations in the hundreds, but this does not include the Nevada State Police arrests, a much higher and unreported number. [One commenter on this post says police presence has decreased significantly since my fiasco in 2009, but reports from 2013 seem bleak.] *69K participants according to BM inc and BLM in 2013.

BM is sexist.  Okay, it is much more complex than this.  There are lots of women taking organizing and leading roles in this event, including lots of women doing very serious construction work and getting seen and appreciated for it.  Burning Man is also a liberated zone, where women can go topless should they want to and it is not a very big deal.  And the stereotypical beauty models and the objectification of women’s bodies runs pretty fierce through the camp.  There is a bit too much of a frat party feel to Burning Man for my tastes.  The type of partying which happens at BM does not lead me to believe it has a good consent culture and i have certainly seen a fair amount of presumptuous behavior on the part of burners. 

Burning Man is classist.  The tickets run between $240 and $420 [Scalpers in 2014 are asking between $800 and $1000], plus the location necessitates significant travel, housing and food expenses. Add to this the cost of costumes, art cars and their registration, desert protective gear and so on.  And of course, no one is requiring you to go to this remote expensive event.  But because it is so pricey, the people who go represent not the 1%, but certainly a more affluent class.  Funologically, BM is often contrasted to the Rainbow Gathering, which is also often remote, but has free admission  and a much more generous internal culture in which all kitchens give food to all comers.  Part of the magic of BM is the spirit of generosity of the event; and it has a ways to go to be more inclusive, particularly for less affluent participants.

Burning Man Inc.  Burning Man is a big company which uses lots of volunteers to make money for themselves.  Certainly millions gets turned around into art projects and critical infrastructure.  And BM advances a DIY effort; it is the ultimate crowd sourcing event.  I wonder if BM were more like the Rainbow Gathering, if they would keep sticking with this piece of desert which costs them $1 million/year – there has to be an equivalently wonderful piece of desert (perhaps privately owned) which costs less.    But even more important than the land, there is something slightly problematic for me about this basically anarchist-organized event that has a bunch of paid staff making decisions, some of which are irreversible.  The latest fiasco around this is the problem with getting tickets.  Bureau of Land Management rents out the site and restricts BM to about 70K tickets.  Now that the event is regularly selling out, how to fairly distribute the tickets if hugely problematic.  BM Inc is bad for democracy.

Other articles you might be interested in if you liked this one include:

This blog post continues to be popular, in part because it is posted in this clever blog series on reasons not to go to Burning Man.

More can be found about this anarchist author from the banned wikipedia page found here.

[Edited by Judy Youngquest]